I have always wanted to be the very well-read person who has read all the classics. Well-versed, well-spoken, well-aware of literature both past and present: that has always been a dream for me. But, in reality, there is so much to read that I certainly don't get to it all. And some classics have gone beyond me -- Middlemarch was more than I could handle, Vanity Fair did me in as well. But Jane Austen, Charles Dickens, F. Scott Fitzgerald, the Bronte sisters are all people I get a long well with. In Canadian literature, I love Robertson Davies and Lucy Maud Montgomery, Jane Urquhart and many others.
But how do you keep up with the classics? Some of them are really tough slugging. Tonight at Book Club we are discussing four staples of literature: Nabakov's Lolita, Henry James' Daisy Miller, Jane Austen's Pride and Prejudice and F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby. I have read all of them now (not all in this past month!) and find such disparity of experience. I do have a long lasting love for Pride and Prejudice but Lolita, I could certainly do without. I guess I'm not sure what makes something a classic and what causes a short lived literary life. And what I consider to be a classic is such a creation of my culture, my setting, my exposure. What are the books that trascend these societal constructs? And do I have the literary stamina to endure stories that have been considered timeless but seem tiring to me?
What are your classics? What books would go with you to a desert island? What makes them so important?