WRONG. I'll take, "Sarah is completely wrong for $200, Alex" wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong.
It is about two women during desegregation, but not two women who get along. Not even two women who engage in a conversation (or at least them haven't yet, I'm only half way done). But, so far, they are not forming a friendship. Admittedly, this lack of relationship-despite-the-odds-theme made me feel remotely better. Apparently, I was afraid of reading another tale of people overcoming situations. Reading it against my own life made me feel inadequate and I feared the judgement I would bring on myself.
I'd like to think I'm a fairly decent person who doesn't discriminate or judge others I don't know based on things like race, ethnicity, social class, etc. But I do fall prey to many cultural norms and tend to hang out people who are like me. Okay, fine, people who are exactly like me. I'm not pushing the boundaries of societal pressure with my relationships. At all. So when I started reading Elizabeth and Hazel I thought this would be yet another book that would make me question whether or not I would have been able to be as brave as these women were (to be clear, I'm not brave like Elizabeth but that's another story) and if I would have been able to befriend the outsider. I was actually pleasantly surprised to find the book more of a historical account of the situation that I find completely fascinating.
As I am realizing that my assumption was wrong and enjoying the alternative presented, it became clear that a fear of having my relationships examined was a bigger issue than I wanted to admit. I should be making friends with people who aren't like me: that's how we grow and learn. I should want to be inspired and challenged into change, not just comforted into complacency. But sometimes comfort is nice. But when the potential content of a book brings up fear of examination (and internal struggles), then it is time for a change.
I'll let you know how it goes.